Nelson Mandela, Divestment, and the End of Apartheid
By Sara Murphy | December 7, 2013 |
As
the world mourns the death of Nelson Mandela -- one of the most
gracious souls ever to tread this earth -- we naturally contemplate his
legacy, and what it means for each of us in our smaller orbits. For many
investors, it was the anti-Apartheid struggle that revealed our ability
to effect change through the power of our money. Our capacity to do so
is as important now as it was during the darkest days of Apartheid.
Campaign against Apartheid
College students launched the movement against Apartheid in 1977, and it became a force to reckon with by the early '80s. Their campaign specifically advocated for divestment: that investors should sell shares of companies doing business with South Africa's Apartheid regime. The foundation of their argument was that none of us should profit from a system that brutally oppresses people. That there should be any controversy in that never ceases to amaze me.
College students launched the movement against Apartheid in 1977, and it became a force to reckon with by the early '80s. Their campaign specifically advocated for divestment: that investors should sell shares of companies doing business with South Africa's Apartheid regime. The foundation of their argument was that none of us should profit from a system that brutally oppresses people. That there should be any controversy in that never ceases to amaze me.
The
divestment campaign became so significant that it made pariahs of the
dwindling cohort of companies still willing to transact with the
Apartheid regime. The effect was so profound that Nelson Mandela
specifically recognized the movement after his release from prison. In a
1990 speech at the Oakland Coliseum, Mandela acknowledged the Campaign
Against Apartheid -- one of the main campus organizations -- by name,
thanking them for their solidarity and contributions to the
anti-Apartheid struggle.
Nobel Peace Prize winner Archbishop Desmond Tutu drew an explicit link in a 2010 piece he wrote in the Huffington Post.
In
South Africa, we could not have achieved our freedom and just peace
without the help of people around the world, who through the use of
non-violent means, such as boycotts and divestment, encouraged their
governments and other corporate actors to reverse decades-long support
for the Apartheid regime.
I
talked with Bennett Freeman, who got involved with the divestment
campaign when he was a sophomore at Berkeley. Freeman recalls that South
Africa's Apartheid regime "crystalized for investors the position that
you could take a moral and political stand through your investment
choices." Previously, socially responsible investing had largely been
the province of faith-based groups, focused on excluding investments in
weapons and alcohol,
Apartheid changed that.
"South
Africa was the first contemporary concern that focused the attention of
first-generation SRIs [socially responsible investors]." Freeman is now
the senior vice president for sustainability research and policy at Calvert Investments,
the first mutual fund company in the United States to divest its South
Africa-linked holdings. Looks like he took the message to heart.
Legacy
The movement that arose from divestment has grown up a lot over the years. Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRI), as it's now known, is the fastest growing asset class in the world. People are becoming increasingly aware of and interested in the long reach of their investment dollars.
The movement that arose from divestment has grown up a lot over the years. Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRI), as it's now known, is the fastest growing asset class in the world. People are becoming increasingly aware of and interested in the long reach of their investment dollars.
Perhaps
the most encouraging development is that SRI has evolved beyond a moral
stance to become a value proposition. More and more evidence is
emerging that companies that create a positive impact on the broader
world around them perform well in the long run, other things being
equal.
Freeman
characterizes Calvert's approach as moving "beyond [SRI's] moral and
political underpinning, not to forsake or forswear it, but to move to a
broader, affirmative proposition for the 21st century." He
reminds us, though, that "the point about Mandela and South Africa is
that while we now have a value proposition in 2013, we still have our
roots in our willingness to make moral choices around our investments."
Comments